Human Interaction

A couple of weeks ago I went to the bank with my mother to deposit money. The bank was empty, but I headed straight to the ATM – that is, until my mom stopped and told me to go to a teller. “But then I’d have to fill out a slip and I don’t remember my bank account number and I’d have to go all the way inside…” the excuses flowed out easily, but I questioned myself. Why didn’t I just go to the teller? I put on my ‘adult’ hat and walked inside. It was fast, easy, and pleasant.

Why didn’t I want to talk to the teller? What makes the ATM more ‘convenient’ if going to a teller takes the same amount of time? The only difference is human interaction. Why is interacting with strangers such a deterrent?

The exponential increase in technology says a lot about society. We’re moving away from small, interpersonal interactions in the name of ‘convenience.’ Virtually everything can be done with minimal contact nowadays; food is ordered online, shipping labels can be printed out, machines eliminate the need for MTA workers and bank tellers. Granted, this technology is very useful and saves a lot of people a lot of time – and as a native New Yorker, I appreciate saved time.

However, social skills are slowly deteriorating. Kids in younger generations are growing up with cell phones in their hands and the virtual world at their fingertips. It’s no wonder my brother asks me to order food on the phone for him (and make the rest of his phone calls); my friends play on their phones while we’re eating dinner together; my sisters email and snapchat me instead of calling.

There are pros: easy, fast, simple communication with a vast expanse of people. We have bigger networks now, bigger than our grandparents could ever imagine. However, there are cons as well: some would argue we have access to too much information; and as court cases involving social networking increase, the line between public and private life is being blurred. Additionally, there’s an expectation that people are now supposed to be readily available via email, text or call.

Text messages. Awkward, awkward text messages. Interpreting them are a pain – is that “haha” sarcastic? If I don’t include a smiley face, does this sound mean? 🙂 Text messages lack body language and nonverbal communication, so we try to include mood indicators through language. That’s a recipe for disaster more often than not. By using “texting” language, we run the risk of losing the genuine message we’re trying to convey.

Additionally, by trying to ‘speak through writing’ we also lose objectivity. Simply put, people don’t take text messages at face value anymore. The reader seeks meaning in each message, and the writer isn’t there to clarify. The abbreviated language used in texting further muddles the intended message.

There’s a difference between physically conveying what you’re saying via body language and tone versus reading a sentence. We don’t convey our thoughts via a written medium the same way we would convey them via a spoken medium; meshing the two together is not working. Simplified written language can’t convey the subtle nuances of spoken language properly.

Convenience has simplified written language and social interaction. We need to be aware of this in our day to day interactions. Humans are such a wary species, especially in New York, but we need to take efforts to interact with each other if we don’t want technology to consume us. We need to make that phone call instead of text. We need to do our banking at the teller.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Human Interaction

  1. initially they volition bring through you money on your first
    leverage since the full world\’s universe are hurting themselves by smoking regular cigarettes. info The vapor cigarettes throwing away the article provides no corroboration of any demonstrated harms from electronic cigarettes.

  2. Excellent well written article! I worry about this all the time just seeing the differences between how I interact with people and how my younger siblings, who have had much more access to technology at the young age, interact. Human communication is so important to personal and social development that if move away from it, there is no doubt that how we relate to the world will begin to change.

  3. I agree that technology has changed the way that we communicate and interact with language. But why are we so resistant to this type of change? The ancient Greeks were hesitant of writing because they claimed it would negatively effect memory. Still, there are so many positive contributions that writing has made to society. As we keep in mind that things should happen in a balanced way, we should also remain cognizant of how resistant society as a whole is to change. Change can be good, and technology has promoted greater levels of expression and engagement by students across the world, and has enhanced creativity and resourcefulness. I went through high school without a computer, and am just now navigating the vast array pf resources that technology has to offer, and fervently promote that social media and technology has done just as much to transform and aid learning as writing has in terms of accessibility and widespread impact.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s